Subscribe to our blog!

Your email:

About Pegasus Communications

Pegasus Communications helps individuals, teams, and organizations thrive in an increasingly complex world. more...

Join us on Twitter @pegasustweets

Leverage Points Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

How Too Much Help Actually Hurts

 | Add to delicious delicious | Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Share on Facebook Facebook | Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn 

By Jeffrey Cufaude

I recently attended a local volunteer meeting. Led by a very dedicated and capable volunteer, the 60-minute meeting consisted almost exclusively of him giving updates on various agenda items. Others attending then commented or responded to his questions. scaleIf someone would have been watching, but not listening, it might have appeared to be a graduate seminar in a professor's home. It was decidedly a one-sided conversation, and not one I would feel the need to participate in again.

Here's the problem, a common one in a lot of organizations, particularly at the local volunteer level. While everyone attending this meeting cares deeply and is willing to get involved, one individual drives the momentum and effort. It's not sustainable. At some point, he will burn out, and a leadership vacuum might emerge. And by holding too much of the responsibility for what gets done, this individual limits the group's productivity and impedes others' initiative. He's not being dictatorial, but his over-responsibility creates others' under-responsibility, a dynamic that Roger Martin explores in his excellent book, The Responsibility Virus.

Maintaining the right balance of responsibility between leaders and followers or contributors requires great attention and vigilance. If the leadership takes too little responsibility, others can flounder, use resources unproductively, or fail to follow through appropriately. If the leadership takes on too much responsibility, others might think their ideas and assistance are not needed or allow leaders to do all the work.

People with drive and commitment often find themselves promoted to (or selected for) positions of leadership. But they have a predisposition to "doer-ship." That is, their greatest gift is getting things done. They are now in a position that has helping others get things done as one of its primary responsibilities. If you find yourself in meetings where all eyes and ears are focused on one individual (maybe it's you!), it might be worth thinking about recalibrating the balance of responsibility.

Jeffrey CufaudeJeffrey Cufaude is an architect of ideas, working to build communities of ideas and idealists through his writing, facilitation, consulting, and speaking. He works on a variety of leadership issues and is especially committed to supporting the work of nonprofit organizations and associations and corporations committed to sustainability and the greater good. Read his Idea Architects blog.

Tags: 

Comments

Thanks for this good reminder and insight. The system that is inadvertently set up by the overresponsible leader often results in resentment on both sides. Leaders with this tendency (and I'm glad you mentioned that the example leader was non-tyrannical) would be well served to spend energy developing skills of engaging and delegating to others, then pass off some of the responsibility. I know this style because I've been it!
Posted @ Tuesday, September 15, 2009 9:20 AM by Sharon Eakes
Thanks for making that issue of overcommittment clear, which can trap anybody of us. 
 
Especially when in a position where all eyes are focused on you (!) one get's the feeling of empowerment which leads to more talking or taking action and inevitably leads to further focusing of the others! 
 
Recalibrating and "going on the balcony" to see from the outside is a skill we have to learn again. 
 
Posted @ Tuesday, September 15, 2009 9:25 AM by Ralf Lippold
@Sharon: I think you're exactly right, and we have to remember that one of the principal responsibilities of leadership is building the organization's capacity to get work done in the future. 
 
@Ralf: I like your "all eyes" language as that could be a good warning sign for anyone in a leadership position. If all eyes are on you, it's definitely time to get others involves so the eyeballs get spread around a bit.
Posted @ Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:26 PM by Jeffrey Cufaude
Spot on everyone. It’s really interesting to note that if a manager/leader is too disengaged (stand-offish) or too helpful, the effect on their followers is the same – a reduction in employee capability. There appears to be a Goldilocks Principle here – not too much, not too little, just right – for each individual employee. The micromanager shuts people down by their rigid adherence to rules, process & policy and their need to be “on top of everything”. They manage by dictatorial “fear” or at least by anxiety. The Charismatic leader on the other hand achieves the same effect by managing by “awe”. Employees are transfixed by the charismatic ‘glow’ and wouldn’t dream of challenging anything The Great Man (or Woman) says. As you well point out Jeffery, any management by a single dominant leader is unsustainable – and as Ralf said, one of the (primary) purposes of a leader is to build capability for the future (make a difference and leave a lasting positive legacy). 
 
One of the problems organizations have is who they choose to promote to the leadership role – as Sharon said, these are usually people who are “doers” and have been successful in doing in the past. They are also probably experts and authorities in their field, which adds another issue. Experts tend to believe they know what is best (and are often correct in this) and there is that psychological condition that the general population often defers decisions to the “expert”. [Refer to Stanley Milgram’s “obedience to authority” experiments and the work of Robert Cialdini.] It’s really difficult for the doer/expert/manager to take a step back and ask their employee “so, what would you do in this situation?” rather than (being efficient) and just proclaiming this “the answer”. 
 
It’s clear that to be a great leader in the 21st century – where engaged and empowered employees really are the most important ‘asset’ an organization has – you must be more a facilitator, teacher and coach, than a manager or supervisor. (Exercise more ‘soul’ than ‘role’.) Prof. Terry Lee of Leadership Psychology Australia has a handy 6 step ‘process’ for good (transformational) leadership (it’s all about the nature of the leader-follower relationship): 
 
1. Be genuinely and authentically interested in the Personal Development of every employee. (This mental frame is the starting point.) 
 
2. Actively listen to people – to their concerns, their problems, beliefs and ideas… 
 
3. … And then act on (at least) some of these ideas. 
 
4. Challenge employees to stretch their skills, knowledge, abilities, assumptions… 
 
5. … but also provide a safety net so failure is a learning opportunity… 
 
6. … and provide feedback and coaching (to close this loop). 
 
By doing this the transformational or breakthrough leader builds capability, confidence, courage and commitment in each and every employee. As employees become more capable and confident, they choose to take on more responsibility. (You can’t have meaningful responsibility without choice – you cannot ‘assign’ responsibility for something to somebody and expect it to stick.) 
 
Cheers, Ian
Posted @ Tuesday, September 15, 2009 7:04 PM by Dr Ian Metcalfe
Very true. This is especially true for small or family businesses. 
 
The owner-manager is usually the "committed and responsible" one. His/her presence gives drive and momentum for the whole business. He/she is also the core connector with the outside world. The others only play supporting roles. 
 
What's wrong with this picture? Sustainability. 
 
Many owner-managers I met complain about their inability to "step aside" from the center stage of their businesses. 
 
To change this, it requires more than the logical recognition of the role-shift from a doer to a people-developer (may call it a "coach"). The owner-manager also need to identify little steps that can reinforce their minds to feel comfortable letting go and seeing others grow. Sometime, these steps can just be little rituals. 
 
This is easier said than done, of course. Over the years, with the family businesses that I've worked with, only around 30% had successfully get rid of this trap. 
 
Cheers, 
 
Catus
Posted @ Tuesday, September 15, 2009 9:00 PM by Catus Lee
an important topic! it's a situation in which i often find myself. i'm a bit of an intiative-o-holic and always have to remember that when i open my mouth too much, i take away air and other space from other participants (and overcommit myself). 
 
btw, re one-sided conversations - reminds me of a fabulous book, "made to stick" (talked about it here http://www.moritherapy.org/article/emotional/). two of the things that make ideas, concepts and motivation stick are telling stories, and not overwhelming people with information. looks like the presenter found it a bit hard not to fall into those traps.
Posted @ Wednesday, September 16, 2009 12:17 AM by isabella mori
@isabella 
 
Air time is a great thing to be aware of and sensitive to good distribution. For fairly extroverted folks, I'm reminded of a mentor who advised me to write things down first and then wait to see where the discussion goes. 
 
Writing it down "extroverted" my thinking so it wouldn't be lost, and by waiting and listening, someone else often makes the same point or I gain new insights that make me rethink what I might want to contribute.
Posted @ Wednesday, September 16, 2009 5:15 AM by Jeffrey Cufaude
This goes back to what I have centered my leadership training on for many years. I have defined leadership as L=WD L=Leadership = Enhancing the (W)orth of others so they can make sound (D)ecisions. 
 
 
 
This little formula helps promote sustainability by helping others develop the skills to step up and take over in an orderly and safe way. Then as the leaders energy and focus wains or the the project gets big enough to overwhelm a single individual, others are prepared to take over. 
 
 
 
What I have observered over the years is that strong leaders are great at starting change and getting things on track, but often do not have the personalities to stick around and "finish" the process. They are ready to go on to another challenge. This little formula helps those leaders focus on getting others up-to-speed early and then allow those with more patience to build or keep the projects going. Many leaders are like sprinters, they can be world beaters in the 100 or 200 meters. Put them in a 800 meter or marathon and they will not make it. Recognizing and maximizing our abilities is a core value real leaders must understand in themselves and recognize in others.
Posted @ Monday, October 26, 2009 3:19 PM by Phil Clark
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

Receive email when someone replies.