Subscribe to our blog!

Your email:

Leverage Points Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Systems Thinking and Lean: Complementary or Competitive Approaches?

 

by Michael Ballé

What is the relationship between systems thinking and lean? That's a fascinating question, one not so easily answered, because we're talking about two very different approaches, one a philosophy as well as a set of tools, the other, a practice. In its broadest sense, systems thinking is a framework that takes into Lockaccount the interconnected nature of systems. It is also a thinking tool, which helps us look at the impact of feedback loops on how a system behaves; analyze specific situations to explain otherwise puzzling behaviors; and design interventions with an eye for potential unintended consequences.

Lean, on the other hand, is strictly a practice, not a philosophy. It is based on hands-on know how about how to teach people to improve their own processes in terms of both customer satisfaction and cost management by eliminating waste. Taiichi Ohno, a key figure in developing the lean approach, would often say things like: "Don't look with your eyes, look with your feet. Don't think with your head, think with your hands." As a practice-oriented movement, lean is by and large wary of abstract thinking and generalizations.

Nonetheless, although systems thinking and lean operate at these two different levels, I have learned from personal experience that they are complementary and are based on similar insights. An understanding of system thinking dramatically improves the learning curve of lean techniques. Having worked with systems thinking concepts and system dynamics simulations for years before studying lean practices in detail, I immediately saw the purpose (if not the application) of lean, which wasn't the case for my colleagues without a systems thinking background.

Conversely, at the time, I was part of a group tasked with figuring out ways to practically apply systems thinking concepts in day-to-day operations. Although we experimented, we generally floundered. What we did find was that the lean techniques offered a hands-on way to apply systems thinking concepts. Because lean practices have been developed over several decades, an entire field of experience exists in terms of how to make them work.

The bottom line: Without an understanding of systems thinking, it's hard to get lean right, and without the practice of lean techniques, it's difficult to make systems thinking a day-to-day reality to concretely improve system performance.

To Understand and to Change
The rapid progress of science since the Industrial Revolution has been driven by the close interplay of theoretical and practical advances. I believe that the mutual interdependence of systems thinking and lean offers a true opportunity here. By recognizing the synergies between these two fields, we can drastically increase our capacity to improve systems.

The bad news is that integrating these two approaches means more work. If I'm correct, system thinkers must acquire the discipline of lean practice. This has been my own particular path: fun, interesting, but never easy. And lean practitioners must make the effort to understand systems thinking, which is a significant intellectual investment.

Still, I believe this challenge is worthwhile. In today's hypercompetitive markets, companies need the performance improvement promised by lean. Furthermore, the strong systems thinking undercurrent of lean makes it focus on reducing waste of all kinds, including externalities such as pollution and garbage. Since its humble beginnings to its recent 2020 global vision, Toyota has continuously aimed to offer value to society overall. Considering the problems we collectively face in this new century, a proven method of industrial improvement also intent on reducing waste in all its forms should not be dismissed lightly.

One of the enduring puzzles of the lean movement is why it hasn't spread more quickly through industry: Many try, few succeed. Systems thinking, I believe, could contribute significantly to solving this conundrum by providing an overall framework to lean practice. To paraphrase Karl Marx, the point is not merely to understand the world, but to change it. Systems thinking offers the means to understand; lean, the practice to change. By pursuing both jointly, we can learn faster how to change the world in the right way to face our global challenges.

Adapted from "What Is the Relationship Between Systems Thinking and Lean?" published in The Systems Thinker, November 2009, V20N9.

Michael BalléMichael Ballé is associate researcher at Telecom ParisTech and managing partner of ESG Consultants. He has written several books and articles about the links between knowledge and management (Managing with Systems Thinking, The Effective Organization, Les Modèles Mentaux), and more recently, co-authored two business novels, The Gold Mine, which has received the Shingo Prize for Excellence in Manufacturing Research, and The Lean Manager. Michael is co-founder of the Projet Lean Entreprise and the Institut Lean France.

Lock photo by Nancy Daugherty

 

Comments

Hi Michael, I love the "GoldMine". I read it during a tour through England a few years back. 
 
Concerning your question on "Why Lean hasn't spread more over the years" I have my own perception gained by many years working at BMW. 
 
http://realworldsd.blogspot.com/2008/09/blog-post.html 
 
I wonder what others think of it and whether my view connects with others' reality.
Posted @ Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:40 AM by RalfLippold
Michael, 
I believe that systems thinking concepts can improve our thinking in all situations - including lean. You state that "An understanding of system thinking dramatically improves the learning curve of lean techniques". What are the systems thinking concepts that you use to improve the learning curve? Jon
Posted @ Wednesday, April 21, 2010 11:27 AM by Jon Bergstrom
One of the principles of Lean is "Optimize the whole". IMO systems thinking (as a practise) complements this principle very nicely together with value stream mapping. 
 
Cheers, Michel
Posted @ Thursday, April 22, 2010 2:25 AM by Michel Löhr
Michel, you have brought it on the point "Optimize the whole" - that is what lean and systems thinking is about. 
 
Not easy because it requires inquiry into deeper understanding the connections of actions and their impact on the whole (in the short AND long run). 
 
Nevertheless improving starts grass roots level with a view on the whole;-)
Posted @ Thursday, April 22, 2010 2:28 AM by RalfLippold
I love this one: http://www.sustainabilityinstitute.org/pubs/Leverage_Points.pdf by DanaMeadows. So true and yet so difficult. 
 
It is like getting in love with a beautiful woman. It is often the most unnoticed action or behavior that triggers the love affair to fire on - pretty similar everywhere in life :-)
Posted @ Thursday, April 22, 2010 4:45 PM by RalfLippold
I'm grateful to have tripped upon this because I have been asking myself this very question. I tend to think in analogies. So I guess I would say Lean is to Systems Thinking as Religion is to Spirituality. There are many religious people who I would not describe as particularly spiritual. Likewise, there seems to be plenty of lean activity devoid of systems thinking. That's a shame.
Posted @ Sunday, May 02, 2010 9:04 AM by Jim Scully
Problem solving in lean focuses on finding the root cause and developing a countermeasure to it. How do you reconcile this with systems thinking, where cause and effect is complex, and often circular and interlocking(hence no root cause)?
Posted @ Wednesday, May 05, 2010 12:15 PM by Simon Ellberger
I appreciate the question, but it sounds a little more like Lean (Six) Sigma than straight-up Lean. Anyway, maybe what we should really do is forget about terminology and re-read Deming. He seemed to reconcile to the two without difficulty.
Posted @ Wednesday, May 05, 2010 12:41 PM by jim scully
Comments have been closed for this article.