Subscribe to our blog!

Your email:

20th Annual Pegasus Conference

Pegasus Conference

Leverage Points Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

No Quick Fixes for Complex Problems

 

By Mark Graban

An editorial written by an American Airlines pilot in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram caught my attention ("Unintended consequences of the Passenger Bill of Rights"). The pilot makes the case that Congress's actions to prevent multi-hour passenger delays on the tarmac give the airlines incentive to proactively cancel flights airplanes on tarmacrather than face the risk of million-dollar fines for a single flight. The result is that, rather than simply being delayed, passengers end up stranded, often not able to book another flight until the following day.

The pilot writes:

"The Passenger Bill of Rights is the wrong answer to the right question that demonstrates two important points. First, a simplistic legislative solution is completely inadequate to a complex problem like tarmac delays.

And second, for all who lobbied for this legislation based on a handful of overpublicized and anecdotally enlarged tarmac tales, when you're in line waiting to rebook your travel, remember that you got what you asked for: You're not waiting on the tarmac. You're simply not going anywhere."

Well-intended actions often lead to unintended consequences. This is a core lesson of the system dynamics field popularized by Peter Senge in his book The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization. I was fortunate to take a course on this topic during my graduate studies at MIT. We learned many lessons of simple actions that, while locally helpful, made the system worse.

One classic example was towns along the Mississippi River that built levees to keep flood waters back. As our professor said, your town's levee only had to be an inch taller than the levee of the town across the river. This led to a levee arms race that inevitably pushed flooding further upstream. The further upstream, the worse the flooding. Locally brilliant, globally suboptimal.

In the case of the airlines, policy makers framed the problem as "passengers shouldn't have to wait without food, water, or working toilets." At the time, the airlines couldn't create a compelling and workable plan either for providing water, food, and toilets or for calling a plane back to the gate temporarily, so Congress stepped in with a "solution" that sounded great as a sound bite. But now you might be more likely to miss the start of a vacation altogether instead of being delayed for three hours.

We can see similar overly simplistic thinking in healthcare. In the United Kingdom, the problem was seen as patients waiting too long in the "Accident & Emergency" department. So the government set an arbitrary target of a 4-hour limit for waiting in A&E.

Hospitals responded in many cases with dysfunctional behavior--unintended consequences. Ambulances were kept parked just outside the door with the patient still inside so that, by a technicality, the 4-hour clock was not yet ticking. Or, patients were admitted unnecessarily, even if they still hadn't seen a doctor, tying up a bed that might have been needed by another patient who hadn't yet hit the 4-hour limit. Instead of improving the overall flow, a simple "solution" was created that didn't take the whole system into account.

Whether it's an airline, factory, or hospital, we need to combine lean with a system dynamics view of our work and value streams. Instead of local solutions that harm the whole, we need to avoid the "quick fix" and the "easy answer" that might cause more harm than good.

As we move forward with the Passengers' Bill of Rights, here's a chance to see if the government practices PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act). If the law isn't working (or the unintended consequences are worse than the benefit), Congress should kill the law. Now I'm being overly simplistic, eh?

Mark GrabanMark Graban is a senior fellow at the Lean Enterprise Institute and is the author of the book Lean Hospitals: Improving Quality, Patient Safety, and Employee Satisfaction, winner of a 2009 Shingo Research and Professional Publication Award. Mark is the founder and lead contributor of LeanBlog.org, where a longer version of this post originally appeared.

Comments

I enjoyed this post Mark.  
 
What if we put our collective heads together and started to think through more systemic solutions to the passenger delay dilemma?  
 
If we look at one of the inflows here (the rate of time delays), what is the source? I'm sure the answer will be characterized by a great deal of combinatorial complexity but it's exploring. 
 
Thinking about solutions... If it's not possible to have extra supplies on planes (due to wait concerns), could delayed planes on the tarmac be serviced by supply trucks from the airport?  
 
L. B. Sweeney
Posted @ Wednesday, July 07, 2010 11:59 AM by L. B. Sweeney
Thanks for these insights, Mark. I will pass this on to my graduate leadership class at St. Mary's College of California. This will supplement "Thinking in Systems" nicely. 
 
 
 
And, I believe we could view leaking oil wells through the same lens, and learn more about oil exploration and ourselves.
Posted @ Wednesday, July 07, 2010 1:10 PM by Steve Byers
Interesting observation on the results of legislation, which is so often the case. 
 
Would be interesting to see a Systems Dynamics review of the recent health care legislation, both ObamaCare and the MA state plan. 
 
Both pieces of legislation have effectively removed all the incentives for the users (beneficiaries) of health care to be smarter, more efficient users.  
 
We should not be surprised if unintended consequences cause the results to turn out to be exactly opposite to the design objectives of the legislation.
Posted @ Wednesday, July 07, 2010 4:19 PM by George Chamberlain
Thanks for the comments.  
 
George - having lived in MA for the past year, I followed the health reform closely. So while, with the new "RomneyCare" law, 97% of residents have "coverage," the waiting times for primary care and internal medicine appointments have gotten much longer, about 40 days for an internist. 
 
It's a classic example of pushing the problem further up or down the river. Problem used to be "lack of insurance" now the problem is "lack of MD office capacity." 
 
Solve one problem, create another, I guess. 
Posted @ Wednesday, July 07, 2010 8:40 PM by Mark Graban
A four hour limit is still absurd. I'd rather have my flight canceled than be stuck inside a cramped plane on the tarmac for four hours or even two hours--even one hour would be dreadful.
Posted @ Saturday, July 24, 2010 7:41 PM by Christian
As someone who has had the experience of being kept on a tarmac for more than 3 hours by American Airlines - and then having that same flight canceled until the next day (and who will never fly their airline again for that injury as well as several similar others), I would say that no matter what view you take - long or short - prohibiting airlines from lengthy passenger captivity on tarmacs is a good thing. I have regularly flown Southwest Airlines for years and have not once experienced that kind of treatment; for me, they are an airline role model for compassionate on-the-ground and in-the-air problem-solving. Delta Airlines comes in a close second. If some airlines can care for their passengers effectively despite unexpected delays and aircraft technical problems, those that struggle to do so might benefit from learning from the effective ones.
Posted @ Tuesday, July 27, 2010 1:31 PM by Kali Van Campen
Thank you for a post and discussion that goes right into my files. I work in pastoral leadership development. In church settings, leaders seem unable to resist the urge to "take care" of a problem with a quick fix, and then get on to something else, thus not attending to the consequences of the fix. We talk about that in our consultations and training, but we often have to unpack the dynamic and come back to the discussion more than once.
Posted @ Wednesday, July 28, 2010 8:45 AM by Dan Gast
Great post. Wouldn't it be great, if as leaders, we would "see" and respond to these issues prior to the need for legislation. We need to step up and fill the leadership gap before our elected officials step in.
Posted @ Tuesday, August 03, 2010 2:59 PM by James Davis
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics