Subscribe to our blog!

Your email:

Leverage Points Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Leader as Convener Not Problem Solver

 

By Deborah Gilburg

Last week, my consulting colleagues and I worked with a group of high-level policy makers from a federal agency. They are not part of an intact team, yet they are routinely tasked with working together on joint projects that impact all the regions they represent. They ranked themselves as “average” when it came to productivity and efficiency—somewhere around a C+. The question they were exploring was whether they had a purpose beyond these tasks: Could they collectively have greater influence on their agency’s future and mission? Did they have the capacity to even go there?

We shared a model based on the work of Ron Heifetz Moher, Irelandthat breaks down the differences between “Technical” and “Adaptive” challenges. Technical challenges are those easily solved by experts through logic and intellect, whereas adaptive challenges cannot be solved by experts but instead require changes in people’s values, beliefs, behavior, roles, relationships, or approaches to work.

Our tendency is to avoid or deny adaptive challenges because they are hard to solve, take time, and the solutions cannot be implemented by edict the way a technical solution can. Rather, they require the collective will of the stakeholders involved to make the required changes.

This model shifted the conversation: Are we trying to find a technical solution to an adaptive quandary? Can we agree on an ultimate purpose when we are unclear about what we can actually accomplish with the will/time/resources we have?

Rather than focus on a solution (a declaration of their collective purpose), the group agreed to experiment with a process to help them make efficient decisions about where and how they might jointly invest the small amount of discretionary time they had. The process required someone to serve as convener, responsible for framing the issue and posing the questions whose resolution would lead to the next step.

The group practiced using the process for the remaining two days of the meeting and became increasingly proficient in its use. They left the meeting with clarity about what additional information may be needed to make a decision, the level of investment and capacity of each member for that issue, a record of follow-up actions and timeframes, and much stronger sense of being part of a team.

This kind of outcome is becoming more common in our work. Adaptive challenges dominate the workplace, as we struggle with changing and uncertain times that require us to adjust our ways and become more innovative, efficient, and inclusive in how we do our work. Leaders who rely on their authority to mandate this kind of change are not seeing the payoff—there may be a new org chart or mission statement, but has the culture shifted? Have people changed their behavior? Is the team really performing at its best?

As our federal group learned, adaptive challenges call for a different approach. Leaders must be conveners, not problem solvers. Their role is to bring together the people affected by the problem to do the work of solving it together. And the focus of a convening leader is not on the solution, but on the process by which the assembled group works together to discover possible solutions and commit to experimenting with them.

Watching our group work last week, I saw an important shift—perhaps slight—in how the members saw their role. It will take time for changes to take hold, but the upfront effort will be worth it in the end. For it is as conveners that leaders can start to restore trust, generate fresh thinking, and create the shared commitment needed to solve critical, adaptive challenges.

Deborah GilburgDeborah Gilburg is a principal of Gilburg Leadership Incorporated, a second-generation family-owned consulting firm specializing in helping leaders and their people increase their individual and collective capacity to thrive in increasingly diverse, complex, and interdependent environments. Together with her business partners (and siblings), Deborah strives to inspire leaders at all levels to fully embrace the human systems that power their organizations—amplifying strengths, illuminating blind spots, and discovering the wisdom and possibility within the collective. She is currently an organizer of a Boston Art of Hosting workshop in January.

photograph of Moher, Ireland, by Nancy Daugherty

Comments

Wow!! What a concise and insightful presentation of a complex idea. Thanks for stirring my thought process about leadership. Too many ideas swirling to articulate them...!
Posted @ Tuesday, November 02, 2010 10:20 AM by Susan
Deborah, 
Nice piece or writing. I have been working on a presentation on using individual passion as a driver for leadership through chaotic times and needed a frame for the presentation. Hiefetz's adaptive leadership model is very powerful and should work. Thank You.
Posted @ Tuesday, November 02, 2010 10:45 AM by Chris Abbey
This post is reflective of our work at ICSI over the past 5 years, and our findings in advancing the transformation of health care. As a collaborative, we are a convener, facilitator and catalyst for many initiatives among our member organizations.  
 
Approximately 5-6 years ago, I became familiar with the adaptive/technical model of Ron Heifetz and colleagues. Since then we have incorporated it's principles into our work. The recognition of technical and adaptive work, and the need for different approaches--especially as a leader has been a key part of our efforts over the past several years. 
 
While many efforts in quality improvement often focus on the "technical" solutions, the need to address the "adaptive" aspects of change are critical if we are to truly make the changes needed.  
 
Indeed, my personal understanding of adaptive work and our work at ICSI as a convener has led to appreciating and integrating the adaptive principles into our efforts. It has been a key part of any recent successes we've enjoyed.  
 
Additionally, it's nice not to have to have the answers as a leader, but rather to provide the environment which allows the solutions to arise from those with whom we have the pleasure to work.
Posted @ Tuesday, November 02, 2010 11:01 AM by Gary Oftedahl
What an interesting shift - thanks for posting! This aligns with work that my organization is doing, which strives to move much of the work of traditional leaders into the systems and processes and focus more on adaptive as opposed to predictive - you might be interested:www.holacracy.org. I'm not sure how it overlays with Ron Heifetz' work, but it sounds like it might integrate well. 
 
Great post!
Posted @ Tuesday, November 02, 2010 2:30 PM by Alexia Bowers
I enjoyed the article and couldn't help but think about the need for adaptive thinking as we look at the challenges facing the schools labeled as "failing." It seems as though policy-makers are focused on the "technical fixes" rather than taking the time create processes that work. I can't think of a greater adaptive challenge than the one facing our educational systems and the cry for "re-invention."
Posted @ Tuesday, November 02, 2010 3:07 PM by Mark Bielang
Please write this as a "press release" as though you have just discovered the holy Grail and submit to every journal, journo and publisher. It might just change the world. And when I return to the "workforce" (currently a full time Dad to a 2.5yr old) I will seek out an org such as yours in Australia.
Posted @ Tuesday, November 02, 2010 4:37 PM by Andrew Beesley
Comments have been closed for this article.