Subscribe to our blog!

Your email:

Leverage Points Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

We Are Living Blindly in an Outmoded Paradigm

 

by Barry Oshry 

In her seminal book, Thinking in Systems, Donella Meadows lists 12 leverage points for intervening in systems. High on her list in terms of effectiveness are those interventions that result in paradigm shifts. Citing Copernicus, Kepler, Einstein, and Adam Smith, Meadow says “people who have managed to intervene in systems at the level of paradigm hit a leverage point that totally transforms systems.”

When people were living in a pre-Copernican paradigm, they didn’t think that they were living in any particular paradigm; they were simply seeing the world as it was. The Sun revolved around the Earth; you could count on it. Every day. It was obvious that the Earth, as God’s special creation, was at the Center of the Universe.

Copernican solar systemThen came Copernicus. Sorry, it seems that the Earth is not the center of the universe, that it, along with other planets, revolves around the Sun. And whole worldviews were turned upside down. First, one man saw it, then a few, then many, and finally a new post-Copernican paradigm emerged. Not without much resistance and soul-searching. In the end, the pre-Copernican paradigm was seen as simply wrong.

We are now living blindly in an outmoded self-centered paradigm, one in which our personal experiences are felt to be the touchstones of reality. In this paradigm, how we feel about ourselves, others, other groups, who are our friends and who our enemies, all of these are experienced as solid reflections of the reality of who we and they are. We are simply seeing the world as it is.

Observations based on my work with the Power Lab and the Organization Workshop suggest a fundamentally different reality. We are systems-centered beings, and much of our experience is shaped not by who we are but by the nature of the systemic conditions we are in.

Organizationally, those at the Top are prone to falling into painful and destructive territorial issues with one another; those in the Middle become alienated, competitive, and evaluative of one another; and those in Bottom fall into the conforming pressures of groupthink. The feelings these people have about one another seem to them to be solid, based on the reality of who they are. Culturally, we observe religious and ethnic groups across the globe experiencing one another as dangers to be avoided or controlled or, in the extreme, destroyed. These feelings too feel solid and based on the reality of who these others are.

Shifting from a self-centered to a systems-centered paradigm provides a fundamentally different understanding of these relationships. We notice how systems processes shape our consciousness. We focus less on individuals and more on whole systems processes. We see systems differentiating (parts becoming more different from one another) and homogenizing (parts maintaining their commonality); we see systems individuating (members moving independently, pursuing their individual objectives) and integrating (members coming together in common purpose.) And we notice the consequences when these processes go seriously out of balance: territoriality, alienation, groupthink, racial and ethnic conflict, among them.

Shifting from a self-centered to a systems-centered paradigm opens up fundamentally different strategies for systems intervention: from self-centered interventions--fix, fire, divorce, separate, therapize, control, destroy one another--to systems-centered interventions--alter the configuration of systems processes, balance over-differentiated systems with homogenization, balance over-integrated systems with individuation, and so forth.

The self-centered paradigm is outmoded; it produces erroneous understanding and misguided interventions. A systems-centered paradigm is being born. First, one person sees it, then a few, them many, until a new paradigm emerges.

Barry OshryBarry Oshry is president of Power + Systems, Inc. and the developer of the Power Lab, a total immersion leadership development program, and the Organization Workshop on Creating Partnership, an essential component in leadership development curricula with a network of 250+ trainers worldwide. Barry is also an accomplished playwright whose plays on leadership, conflict, and organizational culture have been performed for organizations, included in festivals, and adapted for the stage. This piece originally appeared on his blog.

Comments

Wow, thank you Barry and Pegasus for this concise blog. I will be sharing this with a new cohort of graduate students, and with my First Wednesday Conversation group here in Olympia. I particularly appreciate this piece and its clarity after absorbing yet another slug of nonsensical campaign rhetoric on the radio this morning.
Posted @ Tuesday, January 10, 2012 9:34 AM by Steve Byers
Barry, 
Your insights and clarity are very powerful. I am forwarding this to all my friends and family.  
 
We should consider how this might be shared with our politicians. They seem to live in a world of their own making without consideration of the systems they live in.  
 
Thank you. 
 
Jon Bergstrom
Posted @ Tuesday, January 10, 2012 9:41 AM by Jon Bergstrom
What a great article! I love it when someone like Barry concisely describes something both complex and profound. In an elaborated post, I would love to see a few examples of systems-centered interventions, because people are so much less familiar with them than fix, fire, divorce, etc.
Posted @ Tuesday, January 10, 2012 12:51 PM by Sharon Eakes
Great article and much needed in nurse practice settings. Although, I do wonder about a possible difference between self-centered and other-centered, (i.e. w/ nurses a tendency to sacrifice self for others). In either case, the emergence of systems centered paradigm will result in safer, more cost-effective care and more rewarding careers. The skills we have to teach to get there are a little different, I think, but it is exciting to be on the path. Beth
Posted @ Wednesday, January 11, 2012 12:15 PM by Beth Boynton, RN, MS
Really impressed, Barry. I will share it with my students and use it to comment Publici intervention 
 
Thanks for y contribution
Posted @ Thursday, January 12, 2012 8:31 AM by Giovanni Dalla Colletta - Italy
I am very appreciative of the responses to this blog entry and am especially delighted by people's willingness to share this with others. "First, one person sees it, then a few, then many, until a new paradigm emerges."  
A related thought. I'm in the midst of reading The Seventh Telling by Mitchell Chefitz, a novel about teaching the Kabbalah. There was a conversation that struck me as having relevance for our combined efforts to unravel the mysteries of systems. The teacher said something to the effect: "Beware of "this is just that" thinking, connecting something new to what we already know. I had a short tenure on a list serve; I entered what I thought was a unique theoretical piece and the response I got from the list director was "This is like that." I tried again. Same response: "This is like that." Three tries and I quit; I felt that "this" was lost in the big tent of "that." In our varied searches for understanding we formulate many frameworks. What I believe is this: There is value both in seeking commonalities and in elaborating our unique differences. Seeing connections can be a rich conceptual activity and at the same time can blunt the unique power of "this" as distinct from "that."
Posted @ Friday, January 13, 2012 12:09 PM by Barry Oshry
Great blog, Barry. I've forwarded it to a client--the president of a small company rapidly getting large--who had the benefit of going through one of the powerful simulations you've designed to give people experiential insight into "seeing systems." Those workshops are a paradigm-shifting experience, which he and I feel privileged to have experienced.
Posted @ Friday, January 27, 2012 9:06 AM by grady mcgonagill
Good and provoking article.
Posted @ Friday, January 27, 2012 11:03 AM by Margaret Ann
Very succinct and clear article about the new paradigm. Thanks, Barry! And, as you and Adam Kahame have both pointed out, this new paradigm requires us to learn how to balance love and power in ourselves and in our systems: individuating and differentiating generally involve the right use of power; and integrating and homogenizing generally require the right use of love. Part of inhabiting this new paradigm means we need deepen our understanding of these two forces and how they play out in us and our systems.
Posted @ Friday, January 27, 2012 12:55 PM by Mark Horowitz
Comments have been closed for this article.